WELCOME TO EHOST.COM.NP

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Not much has changed for women in 300 years: Pallavi Joshi

Acclaimed actress Pallavi Joshi, who plays Maratha queen Tarabai in the TV series “Peshwa Bajirao“, says though gender equality is being celebrated, the majority of women in India are still facing what they faced hundreds of years ago.


Tarabai Bhosle was the queen of Chhatrapati Rajaram Bhosle, who was a younger son of the empire’s founder Shivaji. After the death of her husband, she took charge of the war against Aurangzeb and continued the insurgency against Mughals.


Asked about the relevance of her character in the Sony Entertainment Television period drama in today’s context, Pallavi told IANS here: “Unfortunately, nothing much has changed for women even after 300 years. As a woman, I can relate to the character and understand the relevance of it.”


“Though she (Tarabai) was one of the strong women, who fought against Mughals to protect and keep the Maratha territories alive, the ministry did not want her as a leader. Reason? She was a woman.”


Pallavi added: “Though in today’s time, we are celebrating the gender equality in every field and I am quite optimistic about the change, the majority is still affected. We must not forget that India is a country where we treated our women as equal counterparts of men, from our ancient times.”


“Things started changing when various outsiders came and attacked our women.”


Starting her career as a child actor, Pallavi acted in various films and popular television series like “Aarohan”, “Imtihaan” and “Justajoo“.


She finds digital media quite liberating for an artiste and she started producing content for that.


When it comes to the urban cool love stories of young Indians, which is the new trend of Bollywood, Pallavi is quite unhappy with it.


“The projection of youngsters’ thought on relationships is not quite right. Everyone falls into bed for the fun of it. Have they nothing to do with emotions? I have spoken to my son, his friends, my nephews and other youngsters to find out — does it really work like that? But according to them, it does not work that way. Then, what is that our filmmakers are trying to show film after film,” questioned the actress.


(Source: IANS)

ADS SPACE

Ishqbaaz:Shivaay Anika developing love brings Saumya Rudra closer







Ishqbaaz: Rudra (Leenesh Matto) and Saumya (Neha Lakshmi Iyer) realizes their love seeing Anika and Shivaay’s love connection 


The upcoming episode of Star Plus popular daily soap Ishqbaaz is going to showcase love in the air drama amid Saumya and Rudra.


Saumya and Rudra are mistakenly married to each other but are not ready to accept their love for each other.





Shivaay and Anika’s intense love story which started from hatred, to forced marriage has now turned a love saga motivates Rudra and Saumya.


Omkara tells Shivaay and Anika that whatever it may be, marriage relationships can’t be ignores and are purest of the forms.


Shivaay and Anika’s love story guides Rudra and Saumya 





Shivaay and Anika’s this intensifying love story guides Saumya and Rudra towards their love and care for each other.


Rudra and Saumya both starts to realize that they like each other but keeps quite thinking that other might not accept it.


Stay tuned for more exciting updates of the upcoming episodes.


Ishqbaaz Anika to dig out Rudra-Soumyas hidden relation secret ...

Ishqbaaz: Anika to dig out Rudra-Soumya

Ishqbaaz is the one of the most successful show of Star Plus showcasing high number of twist and turns in Shivaay (Nakuul Mehta) and Anika’s (Surbhi Chandna) life.


This time the show will showcase twist in Rudra and Soumya’s life.


It was earlier seen that Rudra and Soumya get married to each mistakenly in drunken state and the duo are still living their life with this guilt.


However both Rudra and Soumya love each other but are scared to confess their feelings thinking about rejection from other.


Amid these Rudra brings storm in Soumya’s life when Rudra accepts Tej’s proposed business deal to marry Chadda’s daughter as Om has refused the same.


Soumya breaks down hearing Rudra’s instant decision while Anika will suspect Rudra and Soumya’s hidden relation and will dig out the truth.


Stay tuned for further updates.



Lawsuits Against Trump Crop Up in Less Than 2 Weeks of His Presidency

Several lawsuits have been filed against U.S. President Donald Trump less than two weeks after his inauguration, most of them in connection with the executive order many people refer to as the “Muslim ban.” The action bans travelers from seven majority-Muslim countries – Iraq, Iran, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Yemen – from entering the United States for 90 days and it also suspends resettlement of Syrian refugees in the United States until further notice. VOA’s Zlatica Hoke has more.

Female Wrestlers Help Conservative Indian State Overcome Taboos Against Women

In the northern Indian state of Haryana, an increasing number of young women are taking to wrestling – a sport that has not been traditionally open to them in a deeply patriarchal society. Anjana Pasricha reports how wrestling is helping change conservative attitudes toward women after many scored successes in international contests.

VOA Celebrates 75 Years on the Air

A little more than seven weeks after the United States officially entered World War II, a live, 15-minute shortwave radio broadcast was transmitted into Germany from a small studio in New York City on February 1, 1942.


It was introduced by the American patriotic song “The Battle Hymn of the Republic.” Then, announcer William Harlan Hale’s voice could be heard saying: “We bring you Voices from America. Today, and daily from now on, we shall speak to you about America and the war. The news may be good for us. The news may be bad. But we shall tell you the truth.”


That was the very first broadcast from what, 75 years later, is now the Washington-headquartered Voice of America.


By the end of the war, VOA was broadcasting in 40 languages, with programming consisting of music, news and commentary.


Since then, VOA has grown into a multimedia international broadcasting service, with programming and content in 47 languages on multiple platforms, including radio, television and mobile.


On that first broadcast, announcer Hale’s words set the standard for future programs.


​And since 1976, his words have carried the weight of the VOA Charter, which by law requires VOA to “serve as a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news.” What’s more, it says VOA news must “be accurate, objective and comprehensive.”


FILE - Three former residents of Czechoslovakia tell Czechs how communist leaders of that country sent Associated Press correspondent William N. Oatis to prison through the Voice of America, September 6, 1951.


FILE – Three former residents of Czechoslovakia tell Czechs how communist leaders of that country sent Associated Press correspondent William N. Oatis to prison through the Voice of America, September 6, 1951.


“It’s been 75 years since we first began broadcasting objective news and information around the world,” said VOA Director Amanda Bennett. “And now, I think what we do here is more important than ever.”


Over the years, VOA correspondents and freelance reporters in many parts of the world have been on the scene to cover major world events.


In 1989, VOA East European correspondent Jolyon Naegele reported on demonstrations in Czechoslovakia and the fall of the communist government. Later that year, on the other side of the world, VOA increased programming and added staff to its Beijing bureau to cover the student-led demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. Beijing Bureau chief Al Pessin was expelled from China for his reporting.


Today, VOA broadcasts news and other programming through 2,500 television and radio affiliates around the world. At the same time, it provides content for mobile devices and interacts with audiences through social media.


As of 2016, VOA’s weekly audience across all platforms averaged more than 236 million people worldwide.

Chandra Nandini 31st January 2017 – Full Episode








Flash 720p HD Videos






Dailymotion 720p HD Videos









Watchvideo 720p HD Videos









Chandra Nandini 31st January 2017 Written Episode


Chandra says on one side you give my mother most precious gift and on other hand you do something that annoys and hurts everyone,now cmon have alcohol,Nandini says please Chandra stop it,Chandra says why is it shameful and wasnt it shameful when you keep going to maliketus room and keep waiting for him even when he is married and you too are married,so tell me what is it and I’m not going until I get my answers,Nandini says I’m not answering and not at this moment please leave because I don’t know what you are talking about.


Chandra says I’m king here and you can’t ask me to go and you know Nandini I could sentence you to death for the celebration behaviour but no before taking any step I want to know the truth and is it that you hate me so much that you go
for some other man in front of my family and so who you are, are you the one who is so emotional and caring and can fight to whole world for her father or the other women who is characterless,and don’t you feel bad for Chaya who is pregnant and you want alcohol tell me I will get you but this two sided behaviour I want to know as your husband.


Nandini says since you asking as a husband and not a king let me tell you,I’m a lady who can sacrifice life for loved one,and I have heart which beats for love and emotions,I’m the women who can fight for her loved one,I have a heart which you keep saying you don’t have and that to with pride,Chandra says your heart before was first for your father but now surely must be Maliektu,Nandini says seeing your tears anyone could mistake it for love and would think you can’t see other man close to your woman but you have no idea what I go through,Chandra says you feel bad about marrying me who was a framers son and you a princess and meant to be queen right and thinks but I know Nandini my heart which is there or isn’t has you in it but you have Maliektu in your heart.


Chandra says Nandini last warning stay away from Maliektu and there won’t be any mercy as I have no heart,Nandini says fare enough,Chandra walks away,Nandini smiles and says live with your truth and Ill with mine. Chaya in her room,thinking about nandinis behaviour and says why did Nandini do this,felt like it wasn’t Nandini,helina sees her and says it’s time to take advantage of situation and let the fire spread and says Chaya why are you working ask dasi to do it for you go rest,and why you look worried tell me,Chaya says nandinis behaviour.


Helina thinks well done Chaya,helina says Nandini keeps doing this,I mean sorry Chaya but didn’t you see Maliektu always runs away from Nandini and he is all yours now but Nandini Hasn’t got over him yet, I mean even I was with Maliektu once and Nandini snatched him from me but I got over him and Chandra is mine now,Chaya says no Nandini has told me she doesn’t like Maliektu,helina says you are so innocent I have seen Nandini always keep eyeing on maliketu,Chaya remembers seeing Nandini on her bed.


Chaya says helina stop putting such bad things in my mind I know Nandini and she will never do such thing and leaves,helina says my work is done. Chanakya goes to his house ,his wife says no letter nothing, how will I make all arrangements now,Chanakya says relax I’m alone here,she says you are mahamantri no soldiers no horses how come,Arti his daughter says pitaji come lets have food,his wife sees sarees and says so low quality sarees, Chanakya says you know I don’t take any extra charges,wife says you are mahamantri you should be earning more,Chanakya says I decide what I should earn and this is what I earn,she says but we need more money and Chandra whom you made king.


Chanakya says it was my revenge and he earned it by his hard work and you married me,You should know u worship lord Saraswati and not Laxmi,wife says you want to be bhikshuk,think about me and Arti we need money. Maliketu and Chandra practising swords , Chandra has nandinis words in his mind,Maliektu says maharaj you look distracted is you heart disturbed,Chandra says king has no emotions and defeats Maliektu,Chandra thinks why am I so angry on Maliektu it’s not his mistake,Chandra says Maliektu sorry it’s not your mistake,Maliektu says shall I help,Chandra says careful about what you ask and leaves,Maliektu gets very angry.


Maliektu sees Nandini (Roopa) on his bed,Nandini says I’m waiting for your come close before your evil wife comes,oh cmon and pulls him close and takes his blanket off,and says why didn’t you join me dance,Maliektu says I thought you were playing with me,Nandini says if that was so why would I come here which would get me in trouble and that Chaya I get so angry seeing her,Maliektu sees Chaya says maharani why don’t you understand I am married to Chaya now,Nandini sees Chaya too says but I can’t never forget you,Chaya gets angry and says Nandini enough.


Pre cap: Chandra feels hand coming closer and holds it,and sees its Nandini (Roopa),Nandini says if you want me close there are many other ways too,Chandra finds it odd.


McCain Emerges as Trump"s Top Republican Nemesis in Congress


Sen. John McCain has emerged as President Donald Trump’s top Republican nemesis on Capitol Hill.


Since Trump’s inauguration, McCain has broken with the president on his immigration order, warned him against any rapprochement with Moscow, lectured him on the illegality of torture, and supplied only a tepid endorsement of Rex Tillerson, Trump’s secretary of state nominee.


Oh, and McCain also hammered Trump for backing away from – instead of embracing – international free trade agreements.


As Trump presses ahead with an ambitious and contentious agenda at home and abroad, McCain is pushing back, using his seniority in Congress and his characteristic bluntness. McCain, 80, cruised to a sixth Senate term in November, defeating a Democratic challenger who hounded the senator for standing by Trump even after the billionaire businessman insulted him as a “loser.”


Trump, who received several draft deferments during the Vietnam era, also said there was nothing heroic about McCain’s military record after he was shot down during the Vietnam War and spent 5 years as a prisoner of war.


McCain dropped his support for Trump in early October after a 2005 recording surfaced in which Trump boasted about groping women. The move led to an outcry from conservative voters firmly behind Trump. But McCain overcame the backlash in what may have been his final election.


He hasn’t looked back.


Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., right, read the Wall Street Journal newspaper as they wait for President Donald Trump to speak to House and Senate GOP lawmakers at the annual policy retreat in Philadelphia, Jan. 26, 2017.


Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., right, read the Wall Street Journal newspaper as they wait for President Donald Trump to speak to House and Senate GOP lawmakers at the annual policy retreat in Philadelphia, Jan. 26, 2017.


Trump’s immigration order, signed by the president Friday, temporarily suspends all immigration for citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries for 90 days. McCain, along with his close friend and Senate colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said they feared Trump’s immigration order could “become a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism.”


“This executive order sends a signal, intended or not, that America does not want Muslims coming into our country. That is why we fear this executive order may do more to help terrorist recruitment than improve our security,” McCain and Graham wrote.


That elicited an angry tweet from Trump, who accused the two of “looking to start World War III.”


McCain and other senators said that Trump’s order, unless amended, would ban Iraqi pilots from coming to the United States for training so they can join the fight against the Islamic State. The travel ban could also affect Iraqis who worked with the U.S.-led coalition and, after lengthy reviews, received special immigrant visas to enter the U.S., according to the lawmakers.


“I hope that they are working to walk what they did back and learn that you better really vet these decisions before you make them,” McCain told reporters Tuesday.


As chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain is one of the leading Republican voices in Congress on national security matters. Re-elected last year to another six years in office, he is free to challenge the president without fear of retribution from voters.


U.S.-Russia Relations


And perhaps on no issue has McCain been more unequivocal than of Trump’s desire for a better relationship with Moscow.


Trump’s praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin before and after the election signaled that U.S.-Russia relations could be getting a makeover – even after U.S. intelligence agencies determined Moscow meddled in the campaign to help Trump win.


But McCain has little interest in detente with a country that has invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea, threatened America’s NATO allies, and backed Syrian President Bashar Assad’s “murderous” regime.


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks by phone with Russia


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks by phone with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, Jan. 28, 2017.


Ahead of a telephone call on Saturday between the two leaders, McCain issued a blistering statement in which he called Putin a “murderer and a thug” who will never be an ally of the United States. He cautioned Trump against lifting U.S. sanctions against Russia and voiced his support for legislation that would broaden the punishments and even codify them in law.


“Each of our last three presidents had high hopes for building a partnership with the Russian government,” McCain said. “Each attempt failed, not for lack of good faith and effort on the U.S. side, but because Putin wants to be our enemy. He needs us as his enemy.”


McCain has been bucking his own party for years. In the mid-1990s, he worked with then-Sen. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, to help President Bill Clinton restore full diplomatic relations with Vietnam. McCain also teamed up with Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., and, more recently, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to craft bipartisan legislation aimed at repairing the nation’s flawed immigration system.


McCain served in the U.S. House and then was elected to the Senate in 1986, succeeding conservative Barry Goldwater. He will be 86 when his new term ends, making him one of the oldest- and longest-serving members of the Senate.

Smokers Face Tighter Rules as Tokyo Eyes Smoke-free Olympics


Japan must make public places in Tokyo smoke-free by the time it hosts the 2020 Summer Olympics or risk falling afoul of International Olympic Committee (IOC) rules that call for a healthy games, activists said on Tuesday.


Japan’s health minister has said the government is eager to stamp out smoking in public by the time the capital hosts the Olympics. But smoking remains so entrenched there is still a cigarette vending machine in a Health Ministry annex.


The IOC requires “tobacco-free” games and all recent host cities have passed legislation to ban smoking in indoor and enclosed public spaces, including restaurants, bars and cafes.


Japanese laws encourage restaurants and other public areas to limit exposure to secondhand smoke by setting up barriers or separate smoking and non-smoking areas, but there are no punishments for non-compliance.


Smokers can even light up on the grounds of schools and hospitals.


“The situation for preventing passive smoking in Japan is on a level with that in a developing nation,” said Manabu Sakuta, chairman of the non-governmental organization Japan Society for Tobacco Control.


“We hope for improvement so there will not be lots of problems with passive smoking in all the parts of Tokyo that do not meet the Olympic standards, as well as the games venues after they are built.”


Health Minister Yasuhisa Shiozaki told a news conference in January his ministry aimed to submit a bill on preventing passive smoking during the current session of parliament.


“According to the World Health Organization, Japan’s measures to prevent passive smoking are among the world’s worst,” he said.


But tightening up the rules faces strong opposition from restaurant management organizations, which fear the impact on their business.


Smoking rates have fallen in Japan due to greater health awareness and higher cigarette prices, health ministry data shows, and about 30 percent of men and 7.9 percent of women smoke.


Keisuke Kurimoto, a deputy director of the ministry’s Health Services Section, said it was too early to say what the contents of the proposed bill will be or if it would be ready before the current session ends, probably in June.


“We’re using this as an opportunity, a goal,” he said of the Olympics. “Of course, this isn’t the only reason, the health impact is our main priority.”

US Senate Approves Chao to Lead Transportation Department


Elaine Chao, a former top U.S. labor official, was sworn in on Tuesday to lead the U.S. Transportation Department, which overseas aviation, vehicle, train and pipeline safety.


Chao, a former U.S. labor secretary and deputy transportation secretary, took office hours after the U.S. Senate voted 93 to 6 to confirm her.


Chao, 63, will face key decisions on how to regulate the growing use of drones and automakers’ plans to offer self-driving cars.


She will also be a key player in President Donald Trump’s Cabinet if his administration pushes ahead with a major infrastructure spending program, as the businessman-turned-politician promised during last year’s presidential campaign.


“Your leadership and your experience will serve well as the secretary of transportation, overseeing what we anticipate will be historic investments in our nation’s roads, bridges, airports and above all in our future,” said Vice President Mike Pence, who administered the oath of office to Chao.


Chao tweeted: “It is an honor to rejoin the extraordinary people of @USDOT and begin working to rebuild America’s infrastructure.”


The Transportation Department has a $75 billion annual budget and about 60,000 employees. It includes the Federal Aviation Administration, which handles air traffic control.


Chao, the wife of Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the first Asian-American woman to hold a Cabinet position, also will have to decide whether U.S. fuel efficiency standards should be revised, as some automakers have sought.


There are dozens of other pending regulatory issues facing the next administration, including railroad safety and staffing rules and whether to set rules requiring airlines to give more passengers with disabilities seats with extra leg room and whether to ban or restrict personal phone calls on U.S. flights.


At her confirmation hearing this month, Chao declined to take positions on a number of issues, including whether air traffic control jobs should be privatized, concerns over the safety of shipments of crude oil by rail, foreign airlines’ push to move into the U.S. market and regulation of developing technologies.


AAA, the largest U.S. auto club with more than 50 million members, praised Chao’s confirmation. AAA CEO Marshall Doney said the group “firmly believes that significant, additional investments are needed to maintain existing infrastructure and to enhance the nation’s (transportation) system.”


The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents major U.S. and foreign automakers, said that from “autonomous vehicles to safety to fuel efficiency to infrastructure, Secretary Chao’s leadership will profoundly impact our sector and many others.”

India IT Stocks Slip Amid Worries about Stricter H-1B Visas


The shares of top Indian IT companies sank Tuesday in response to news of proposed U.S. legislation that could make it harder for companies to replace American workers with those from countries such as India.


By late afternoon, shares of all the main IT companies, such as Infosys, Wipro and Tata Consultancy Services, had fallen 2 percent to 4 percent on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The IT sub-index on the exchange, which comprises all the tech firms trading on the stock exchange, shed more than 3 percent.


The High-Skilled Integrity and Fairness Act of 2017 introduced last week in the House of Representatives by Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California’s Silicon Valley area, aims to end what it calls the “abuse” of the work visa program, which it says has “allowed replacement of American workers by outsourcing companies with cheaper H-1B workers.”


FILE - Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 12, 2016.


FILE – Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 12, 2016.


The H-1B program allows high-tech companies to hire foreigners with technical skills in the U.S. for three to six years. If enacted, the legislation would raise the minimum annual salary for certain reporting exemptions to $130,000, from $60,000. The change could require more companies to prove that they indeed tried to hire U.S. workers first and hadn’t displaced any Americans. The bill also includes prioritization for higher-paying jobs and would set aside 20 percent of H-1B spots for businesses with no more than 50 employees.


“My legislation refocuses the H-1B program to its original intent — to seek out and find the best and brightest from around the world, and to supplement the U.S. workforce with talented, highly paid, and highly skilled workers who help create jobs here in America, not replace them,” Lofgren said on her website.


The proposed bill comes as the tech industry is reeling from an executive order on immigration from President Donald Trump that bars nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S.


The U.S tech industry relies on foreign engineers and other technical experts for a sizeable percentage of its workforce.


While the tech industry insists the H-1B program is crucial, critics say it puts American programmers and engineers at a disadvantage. Trump’s nominee for attorney general, Sen. Jeff Sessions, has long opposed the program.


In New Delhi, a foreign ministry spokesman issued a one-line statement.


“India’s interests and concerns have been conveyed both to the U.S. administration and the U.S. Congress at senior levels,” Vikas Swarup said.

3 Notable Opinions of Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch

Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, has been on the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals since 2006. Here are summaries of some of his notable opinions:


HOBBY LOBBY STORES v. SEBELIUS: Gorsuch voted with a majority of the 10th Circuit in favor of privately held for-profit secular corporations, and individuals who owned or controlled them, who raised religious objections to paying for contraception for women covered under their health plans.


Gorsuch wrote a separate opinion in which he explained the moral dilemma facing the family that owns Hobby Lobby. “As they understand it, ordering their companies to provide insurance coverage for drugs or devices whose use is inconsistent with their faith itself violates their faith, representing a degree of complicity their religion disallows. … No doubt, the Greens’ religious convictions are contestable. Some may even find the Greens’ beliefs offensive. But no one disputes that they are sincerely held religious beliefs,” he wrote.


UNITED STATES v. GAMES-PEREZ: Gorsuch was on the losing end of a vote by the full 10th Circuit over whether to rehear the case of a man who was convicted of having a gun after having earlier been convicted of a serious crime. The issue was whether the defendant knew that his earlier conviction was for a crime that disqualified him from owning a gun.


Gorsuch argued in favor of a new hearing. “None of these arguments compels us to perpetuate the injustice of disregarding the plain terms of the law Congress wrote and denying defendants the day in court that law promises them.”


GUTIERREZ-BRIZUELA v. LYNCH: In this 2016 case, Gorsuch wrote for a panel of judges who sided with a Mexican citizen who was seeking permission to live in the U.S. The case gave Gorsuch an opportunity to raise an issue he has championed in his time as a judge: whether courts should so readily defer to federal agencies in determining what laws and regulations mean.


Referring to high-court cases that Gorsuch believes cede too much power to agencies, he wrote: “There’s an elephant in the room with us today. We have studiously attempted to work our way around it and even left it unremarked. But the fact is Chevron and Brand X permit executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core judicial and legislative power and concentrate federal power in a way that seems more than a little difficult to square with the Constitution of the framers’ design. Maybe the time has come to face the behemoth.”

Factbox: Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch

NAME: Neil Gorsuch


BIRTHDATE: August 29, 1967


BIRTHPLACE: Denver, Colorado


EDUCATION:


1988 – B.A., Columbia University; 1991 – J.D., Harvard Law School; 2004 – D.Phil., University of Oxford


CURRENT JOB:


2006-present: Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (appointed by President George W. Bush)


JOB HISTORY:


2005-2006: Principal deputy, associate attorney general, U.S. Department of Justice


1995-2005: Private law practice, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans, and Figel, Washington, D.C.


1998-2005: Partner, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans, and Figel, Washington, D.C.


1995-1998: Associate, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans, and Figel, Washington, D.C.


1993-1994: Law clerk, Hon. Byron White and Hon. Anthony Kennedy, U.S. Supreme Court


1991-1992: Law clerk, Hon. David Sentelle, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit


FAMILY: Wife, Louise; two daughters, Emma (born 1999) and Belinda (born 2001). Gorsuch’s mother, Anne Gorsuch Burford, was the first female head of the Environmental Protection Agency under President Ronald Reagan.


OTHER ACCOMPLISHMENTS:


While at Columbia, Gorsuch co-founded a newspaper (The Federalist) and a magazine (The Morningside Review).


QUOTE:


“The independence of the judiciary depends upon people in both parties being willing to serve, good people being willing to serve who are capable and willing to put aside their personal politics and preferences to decide cases and to follow the law and not try and make it” — from his 2006 confirmation hearing for the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

Interactive: a snapshot of political donations in Australia for 2015-16

The Australian Electoral Commission on Wednesday released data showing donations to political parties for the year 2015-16. The interactives below show the total donations to Australia’s major parties, who the biggest donors to the parties were, and how donations to parties have changed in recent years.


You can read Yee-Fui Ng’s analysis piece on what the donations reveal here.





Israel "Sorry for Any Hurt" With Mexico Over Wall Tweet


Israel’s president told his Mexican counterpart on Tuesday that he was “sorry for the hurt” over a tweet in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to praise U.S. President Donald Trump’s plans to build a wall on the Mexican border.


In a tweet Saturday that drew a rebuke from Mexico, the right-wing Netanyahu wrote: “President Trump is right. I built a wall along Israel’s southern border. It stopped all illegal immigration. Great success. Great idea.”


Netanyahu had earlier sidestepped Mexico’s demand for an apology and echoed previous Israeli explanations — rejected as insufficient by Mexico’s foreign minister on Monday — of his remarks on Twitter. He said his comments did not refer to ties between the United States and its southern neighbor.


The office of President Reuven Rivlin, whose post is largely ceremonial, issued a statement taking a more conciliatory line.


“I am sorry for any hurt caused as a result of this misunderstanding, but we must remember that we are talking about a misunderstanding, and I am sure that we can put the issue behind us,” Rivlin was quoted as telling Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto.


FILE - Mexico


FILE – Mexico’s President Enrique Pena Nieto pauses during a press conference at the Los Pinos presidential residence in Mexico City, Jan. 23, 2017.


Maintaining friendship


Mexico’s Foreign Ministry acknowledged Rivlin’s apology. The ministry said Pena Nieto told Rivlin the tweet had upset Mexico and its Jewish community, before adding that Mexico wanted to maintain its friendship and cooperation with Israel.


On Monday, Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray said he thought an apology would be “appropriate” for Netanyahu’s tweet, while noting that Israel was a close friend of Mexico.


Trump’s planned border wall, which he says will keep out illegal immigrants, along with his threat to impose punitive taxes against Mexico to rebalance trade, has brought about the worst crisis in U.S.-Mexican relations in decades. Trump signed an executive order last week ordering construction of the wall.


Netanyahu, in public remarks on Monday, said that in his tweet he had been referring to Trump’s praise for the barrier Israel constructed along the Egyptian frontier, a fence with electronic sensors that has largely halted the influx of African migrants.


“I did point out the remarkable success of Israel’s security fence. But I did not comment about U.S.-Mexico relations. We’ve had, and will continue to have, good relations with Mexico,” Netanyahu said in English at a cybersecurity conference in Tel Aviv on Tuesday.


Political commentators and opposition politicians in Israel said Netanyahu’s tweet had needlessly thrust Israel into the U.S.-Mexican feud.


At the Tel Aviv conference, Netanyahu said that Israeli-Mexican ties “are much stronger than any passing disagreement or misunderstanding.”

Supreme Court Nominee: Colorado Judge Neil Gorsuch

President Donald Trump has chosen Neil Gorsuch, a judge for the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Colorado, as his choice to fill the vacant seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.


Trump made the announcement at a prime-time news conference at the White House Tuesday night in Washington, D.C.


Gorsuch would fill the seat left empty by the death of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016.


Gorsuch, 49, would be among the youngest nominees for the court. Justice Clarence Thomas was 43 when nominated, and Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan were each 50 when confirmed.


10th Circuit Court of Appeals


Gorsuch, a native Coloradan, was appointed to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2006 by former President George W. Bush.


He received degrees from Columbia University, Harvard Law School and the University of Oxford. As a law student he clerked for Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. White was also from Colorado.


Gorsuch is an avid outdoorsman, hunting, fishing and skiing in the mountainous state of Colorado.


He admired Scalia, calling the former justice a “lion of the law” during a speech at Case Western Reserve University Law School last year.


According to a revew in SCOTUSblog, a blog written about the Supreme Court by lawyers, and law professors and students, there are strong comparisons between Gorsuch and Scalia.


“The great compliment that Gorsuch’s legal writing is in a class with Scalia’s is deserved: Gorsuch’s opinions are exceptionally clear and routinely entertaining; he is an unusual pleasure to read, and it is always plain exactly what he thinks and why,” SCOTUSblog wrote.


“Like Scalia, Gorsuch also seems to have a set of judicial/ideological commitments apart from his personal policy preferences that drive his decision-making,” the website’s analysis said.


Natural successor


The blog also said one study found him to be the most natural successor to Scalia, in terms of his judicial style and substantive approach.


Law professor Justin Marceau described Gorsuch as “a predictably socially conservative judge who tends to favor state power over federal power,” according to a report by The Denver Post in December 2016.


On the 10th Circuit, Gorsuch has written 175 majority opinions and 65 concurrences or dissents, Rebecca Love Kourlis, a former Colorado Supreme Court justice, told the Associated Press.


Gorsuch has not ruled on abortion, but in 2013, he joined an opinion that said owners of private companies can object on religious grounds to a mandate in the Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide coverage for birth control for women.


He also has written The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, a legal and ethical look at the topic, including an argument against their legalization.


Gorsuch’s mother, Anne Gorsuch Burford, was tapped by former President Ronald Reagan to be the first female head of the Environmental Protection Agency.


He lives near Boulder, Colorado, with his wife, Louise, and their two daughters.

The best legal arguments against Trump"s immigration ban

Is President Trump’s recent executive order on immigrants and refugees legal?


It’s a surprisingly tricky question.


The order arguably violates both a federal statute and one or more sections of the Constitution – depending on whether the immigrant is already in the U.S. In the end, opponents’ best hope for undoing the order might rest on the separation of church and state.


Trump’s order bars the entry of any refugee for 120 days, and Syrian refugees indefinitely. It also bans citizens of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Yemen from entering the U.S. for 90 days. This order potentially affects more than 20,000 refugees, along with thousands of students nationwide. Depending on how it is enforced, it could also impact as many as hundreds of thousands of green card holders, or immigrants with permanent residency.


Many opponents have challenged the order in court.


A U.S. District Court judge in Brooklyn, New York, issued a ruling that halted the enforcement of Trump’s executive order the day after he signed it. Judges in at least four other states followed suit.


Trump’s supporters defend the order’s legality based on a federal immigration statute passed in 1952 that allows the president to suspend the U.S. entry of “any class of aliens.” But, as a former U.S. Justice Department lawyer and a law professor, I believe there are at least four possible arguments challenging the legality of the order.


Anti-discrimination statute


There is, critically, another federal statute that outlaws discriminating against a person regarding issuing visas based on the person’s “nationality, place of birth, or place of residence,” which Trump’s order clearly does. This second statute was passed in 1965 and is more specific than the 1952 statute. What’s more, courts have enforced this anti-discrimination ban strictly. This is the strongest legal argument against President Trump’s order.


But Congress can amend or repeal the 1965 statute, as it can any law. A Republican-controlled Congress might do that, although concerns raised by some GOP lawmakers may make that unlikely.


Due process and equal protection


The recent court orders halting enforcement of the Trump order relied on a legal argument that it violated due process or equal protection under the Constitution. Due process means that people get procedural safeguards–like advance notice, a hearing before a neutral decision-maker and a chance to tell their side of the story–before the government takes away their liberty. Equal protection means the government must treat people equally, and can’t discriminate on the basis of race, alien status, nationality, and other irrelevant factors.


As the Supreme Court has said, even immigrants who are not citizens or green card holders have due process and equal protection rights, if – and only if – they are physically here in the U.S. That’s why the recent court orders on due process and equal protection help only individuals who were in the States at the time the court ruled.


Given the rushed, chaotic manner in which the recent order was drafted and enforced, with no set chance for affected individuals to plead their case, maybe there are some valid due process arguments against the ban. But presumably, those can be fixed by slowing down and letting people have their say. Once that’s done, the remaining issue is whether the executive order violates equal protection by intentionally discriminating against Muslims.


Trump denies the order is a “Muslim ban,” even though he called for exactly that during the campaign, and each of the seven countries subject to the ban is majority Muslim. In explaining why those seven countries were chosen, the order itself cites the Obama-era law stating that persons who in recent years have visited one of these seven terrorism-prone nations would not be eligible under a “visa waiver” program. Similarly, says Trump, the defining characteristic here is terrorist danger, not religion. That’s why only seven of more than 40 majority Muslim countries are affected. (Note that the Obama-era rule isn’t based on nationality, but rather on whether someone of any nationality visited the danger zone since 2011 – a criterion not outlawed by the 1965 statute.)


One problem with Trump’s argument is that the order also seems to prioritize admitting Christian refugees. It does this by saying that once the 120-day ban on all refugees expires, priority goes to those of “a minority religion in the individual’s country.”


Supporters can rightly argue this “minority religion” language is neutral. It never mentions Muslims or Christians. But, as that neutral language interacts with the country-specific ban targeting seven Muslim countries, the two can’t help but disproportionately help Christians. Indeed, just days before signing the order, Trump told the Christian Broadcasting Network he intended to prioritize Christian refugees.


Separation of church and state


That brings us to the final legal argument against the president’s order. By picking favorites among religions, it violates the separation of church and state under the Constitution’s Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Though Establishment Clause law is often murky, one clear point is that the government can’t favor one religious denomination over another.


This may be the most important of the constitutional theories involved in this case because it may have the broadest scope.


The due process and equal protection arguments only help persons who are already in the United States. Theoretically, a court ruling on those arguments might invalidate the order only as it applies to such persons. But if the order violates the Establishment Clause by making a statement favoring Christianity, a court could strike it down entirely.

Modified Transportation Opens Up World to Disabled in Phnom Penh


For Reaksmey Mary and her family, a recent trip for a health checkup at a Phnom Penh hospital included a detour through downtown and visits to shopping malls.


The trip was a milestone for the group, who could no longer transport Reaksmey by motorbike. For years, she remained homebound on the Mekong River island of Koh Oknha Te, 15 kilometers from Phnom Penh.


Today, Reaksmey and her family use Mobilituk, a service for the physically disabled. Mobilituk has five tuk-tuks — small three-wheel motorized vehicles — that have been modified by Agile Design Group, a Phnom Penh-based organization that specializes in design projects that promote the inclusion of disabled people into everyday life.


Reaksmey was disabled with a serious illness when she was six months old. Her mother, Khem Vy, 47, told VOA that since her daughter was about 10 years old, “we could no longer take Mary anywhere by motorbike.” The family tried using a regular tuk-tuk, but that proved difficult as well. The driver would struggle to get Reaksmey and her wheelchair into the cab.


FILE - Reaksmey Mary and her mother, Khem Vy, took Mobilituk, a tuk tuk designed for disabled person, in Phnom Penh, Dec. 21, 2016. (Hean Socheata/ VOA Khmer)


FILE – Reaksmey Mary and her mother, Khem Vy, took Mobilituk, a tuk tuk designed for disabled person, in Phnom Penh, Dec. 21, 2016. (Hean Socheata/ VOA Khmer)


“The wheelchair is very heavy. I am alone and I can’t do it unless we have two people to hold her tightly,” Khem said. “We stopped taking her out, so she stayed at home on the bed all the time.”


Today, the Mobilituk — with a steel ramp that pulls down to allow a wheelchair to roll up — gives Reaksmey and her peers freedom. Or, as blogger John Morris wrote in an enthusiastic review of a Mobilituk: “affordable, wheelchair transportation means that disability in a developing country no longer has to be a sentence of house arrest.”


According to Cambodia’s Ministry of Social Affairs, by 2015 there were more than 50,000 physically disabled people in Cambodia. The Asian Development Bank estimates that as much as 15 percent of the population, placed at 15.9 million in 2016 by the CIA World Factbook, live with physical or mental disabilities.


Even in developed nations, disabled people encounter transportation hurdles, but in developing nations like Cambodia, the barriers are often higher.


Widespread benefits


Agile Design Group, working with the International Committee of the Red Cross, plans to expand the fleet of Mobilituks in the northern provinces of Cambodia. Keogh Johnston, an ADG engineer, told VOA Khmer that while the Mobilituk program benefits people with disabilities, it has been a rewarding project in other ways, too.


FILE - Mobilituk driver Ker Sarout is shown in Phnom Penh, Dec. 20, 2016. (Hean Socheata/ VOA Khmer)


FILE – Mobilituk driver Ker Sarout is shown in Phnom Penh, Dec. 20, 2016. (Hean Socheata/ VOA Khmer)


“When you see somebody, who never had the opportunity to see the city or go to a shopping mall or see more monuments,” he said, “the joy that brings to them to see, you are just inspired to contribute more.”


Mobilituks also expand opportunities for tuk-tuk drivers. A month after getting his tuk-tuk converted to a Mobilituk, driver Keo Sarout had two disabled clients, including Reaksmey.


“My clients said it’s more convenient than a car or other vehicle,” he said.


And Keo is pleased he can help. “I think I could help the society by helping the disabled persons as they find it quite difficult to travel anywhere,” he said.


He added that other tuk-tuk drivers, having seen his Mobilituk, were interested in having the steel ramp installed on their vehicles.


With access to a Mobilituk, Reaksmey has traveled to the Royal Palace, Independence Monument, shopping malls, and the hospital. With her mother and an aunt along for the ride, these excursions are no longer ordeals.


Reaksmey looks healthier and happier now, said Khem.


“Although her body got hurt the first time she went on Mobilituk, because it was almost 20 years that she has not moved her body properly, she feels very happy,” Khem said.


“I asked her if she still wants to go out after hurting herself; she nodded her head with a happy smile.”


This story was produced by the VOA Khmer Service.

Undocumented US "Dreamers" Still in Limbo

U.S. President Donald Trump has issued three executive orders that pertain to immigration in the past week. While that seems like it should be definitive, one important group of undocumented immigrants is still in limbo.


At least 750,000 undocumented immigrants are still protected from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, signed by the previous administration. They are undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children — commonly known as “dreamers.”


But DACA expires in two years and after tumultuous days during which hundreds of visa holders have been denied entrance to the U.S., immigration proponents worry that the program is still on the table.


“At this point, I think we have to assume that everything that Trump said during his campaign, he’s going to try to fulfill because so far that’s what he has done … We have to be prepared,” Alma Couvorthie, senior director of community organizing at CASA de Maryland.


Although Trump’s day one promise was to end DACA, he told Time magazine in December that on this issue, at least, he is willing to “work something out.”


But a provision in one of his immigration executive orders may say otherwise.


President Donald Trump sits at his desk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.


President Donald Trump sits at his desk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.


Prepare for the worst


Trump’s executive order, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States, says the government cannot “faithfully execute the immigration laws of the United States if we exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement.”


Which brings Couvorthie to urge lawyers, immigration advocates, and undocumented immigrants to “be ready, get prepared, know your rights, and get organized in local communities.” Couvorthie said the whole pro-immigration movement will “exhaust any avenue” to get relief either through the courts or Congress.


“We should not, for any minute, think that he’s going to care for our kids and the families who have benefited from this program and who are actually contributing greatly to this nation,” Couvorthie said.


Bargaining chip?


Proponents of tougher immigration laws and anti-immigration groups believe Trump should follow through with his promises to end deferred action.


Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, or FAIR, advocates for more restrictive immigration policies, has told VOA he expects some leeway when it comes to the dreamers.


“There’s no fundamental reason why one group of people should be allowed to break the law or others, but in the course of any kind of meaningful reform there’s going to be some kind of give and take,” Stein said, adding that DACA might be a place for some give.


Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich introduces Donald Trump during a campaign rally, Sept. 19, 2016, in Ft. Myers, Florida.


Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich introduces Donald Trump during a campaign rally, Sept. 19, 2016, in Ft. Myers, Florida.


Gingrich backs DACA


Former House speaker Newt Gingrich, an informal adviser to Trump, told the Washington Post he is advising President Trump to keep DACA in place and “avoid a politically treacherous confrontation.”


“Why pick a fight over this group of people who have a lot of emotional stories to tell? It’s not realistic. It’s not practical,” Gingrich told the newspaper.


‘One of the lucky ones’


Thirty-year-old Maria Reyes, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico brought to the U.S. at 13, refuses to be scared.


“I’m one of the lucky ones because I am here. … These orders are actually bringing the community together. I’m confident this [DACA] is not going to change. Sometimes I worry, but I know I’m not alone,” Reyes told VOA.

Philippine Police Killings a Possible ‘Crime Against Humanity’, Says Amnesty

Amnesty International claims that the Philippine government has ordered the police to kill thousands of alleged drug offenders in a wave of executions that may amount to crimes against humanity. As Henry Ridgwell reports, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte this week ordered all police anti-drug units to be disbanded in the wake of the killing of a South Korean man, allegedly by corrupt officers.

Union-backed Ronald Vitiello Named to Head US Border Patrol


A longtime Border Patrol official who is backed by the agents’ union has been named chief of the agency, less than a week after his predecessor resigned under pressure.


U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced Tuesday on Twitter than Ronald Vitiello has been appointed to lead the agency at a time when President Donald Trump has pledged to erect a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico and add 5,000 agents from the current level of about 20,000.


The National Border Patrol Council – an early and outspoken backer of Donald Trump’s presidential bid – openly supported Vitiello for the job and pushed for the ouster of his predecessor, Mark Morgan, who resigned last week at the request of the new administration.


Morgan stepped down only seven months after being named the first outsider to run the agency since it was created in 1924.


Vitiello, who was most recently CBP’s executive assistant commissioner for operations support, was acting Border Patrol chief when Morgan was appointed last year and had been considered a leading contender for the job then.


He joined the Border Patrol more than 30 years ago and served as deputy chief in the administration of former President Barack Obama.


Brandon Judd, the union president, said in a recent interview that Morgan never had the support of agents.


“[Vitiello] and I do not see eye to eye on a great, great many things but we were always able to keep it respectful, always,” Judd said. “Morgan and I have not been able to do that.”


The appointment is not subject to Senate confirmation.

What did Galaxy"s poll tell us about freedom of speech and 18C? Not what the IPA said it did

In evidence to the parliamentary inquiry into freedom of speech on Tuesday, the Institute for Public Affairs (IPA) think-tank tendered a statement based on a survey it had commissioned from Galaxy Research. The Australian newspaper covered this polling as a front-page “exclusive”.


The second paragraph in the IPA’s media release claimed – without evidence – that there was set to be much surprise among the media and the political class that 95% of Australians think “free speech matters”.


The release then reported that 48% of people supported removing the words “insult” and “offend” from Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.


The IPA actually wants the whole of 18C removed. But the way forward since then-prime minister Tony Abbott baulked at the gate on the changes proposed by his attorney-general, George Brandis, in 2014 has been this apparently minor surgery to the less serious end of the unlawful quartet (the others being “humiliate” and “intimidate”).


But is the IPA’s statement a fair reading of the Galaxy polling? And was the research fair to start with?


Questions of methodology and polling


According to a Galaxy spokesperson whom I spoke with on Tuesday, no attempt was made to ensure the sample included a representative component of Indigenous and non-Anglo or overseas-born Australians.


Such data was not collected as part of the study as the client (the IPA) had not asked for it, so the results could not be profiled on these criteria. Yet these are the people 18C is mostly designed to protect.


Chances are that an average online panel (the Galaxy polling was done mainly online) won’t include many Indigenous people, people with poor English, or people from minority refugee communities – that is, the primary targets of race hate speech. We had to work hard to ensure our online survey on a similar issue included enough minority-group Australians to ensure statistical accuracy.


The IPA research was two questions in the regular Galaxy omnibus survey, which seeks to control only for age, gender and region. It also looks at shopping patterns.


The first question was:



How important is freedom of speech to you?



This was designed to position the respondent positively to the question and its point of view.


The second question was:



Do you approve or disapprove of the proposal to change the Racial Discrimination Act so that it is no longer unlawful to “offend” or “insult” someone because of their race or ethnicity? It will still be unlawful to “humilitate” or “intimidate” someone because of their race or ethnicity.



This aims to deliver the coup de grâce that reinforces the desired outcome.


So, more than 95% of those polled thought freedom of speech was important. This is a no-brainer. Had the question been – as other surveys have put it – “Is freedom of speech more important than freedom from hate?”, the percentage of those in favour may well have come down significantly. Or if that question were to be reversed, even more so. But we will never know.


Then the question of removing “insult” and “offend” was put. Less than half of any group supported this. Given the preparatory question and the lack of information about the implications or impact, this is less than one might have predicted.


However, neither Galaxy nor the IPA discussed the most interesting data.


Youth responses show IPA conclusions invalid


In the Galaxy poll, the 18-24 age group had the highest commitment to freedom of speech but the lowest support for removing “insult” and “offend” from 18C – by a long way.


So, a suggestion that a commitment to freedom of speech necessarily carries with it support for amending 18C is simply false. There is no simple correlation. They appear to be independent variables, though mediated by some other factor – probably social media use.


There is a much better explanation which neither Galaxy nor the IPA evoked.


The 18-24 age bracket comprises the true digital natives; a very high proportion are regular users of social media. Our research shows they have the highest rate of encounters with racist hate speech. They are usually witnesses, though sometimes are targets. Most encounters with online hate happen on Facebook (40%), YouTube (20%) and in comment threads on news media site (15%).


Digital natives value freedom. But they also want vulnerable people protected and civility enhanced. And they don’t trust sites like Facebook, YouTube or Google to do that – nor, it must be said, government.


In our research, young people were among the least likely to want offending someone on the basis of race to be lawful, just like those surveyed by Galaxy for the IPA. However, they were more likely to hold a neutral position than older people; they were more reluctant to force regulation, but more aware of what racism did to its targets.


The people most in support of retaining 18C in our study but not in Galaxy’s were the older group, who are far less likely to use social media and thus encounter cyber-racism. In our study, the people most likely to want the right to offend people were those who identified themselves as authors of racist material.


So, it follows that the less racism you encounter that you don’t want to see, the less likely it is that you’ll worry about it. The more you want to freely offend people, the more likely it is you author racist material.


Lucky I read the report – or you’d never have known quite what the IPA was selectively trying to slip through to the inquiry and the press. Be sure, though, that the claim most Australians want 18C gutted in the name of freedom of speech simply is not supported by evidence.

US Airstrikes Target Taliban Positions in Southern Afghanistan


The United States military said Tuesday that it has conducted airstrikes to help Afghan security forces hold off a major Taliban assault on a key district center in the embattled southern Helmand province.


Fierce fighting has been raging in and around the town of Sangin since early Monday when the insurgents staged a well-coordinated major offensive to try to overrun it.


A U.S. military spokesman told VOA Tuesday approximately 10 airstrikes have been carried out in the last 24 hours in and around Sangin.


“These strikes targeted Taliban fighting positions. We will continue to aggressively support our Afghan partners as they defend Sangin from the Taliban,” the spokesman said in a written statement without giving further details.


Preparing for spring season


Afghan Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah traveled to the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah on Tuesday to assess the security situation.


An official statement said that Abdullah directed security forces to push back the insurgents in Helmand before fighting intensifies in the spring season.


A Taliban spokesman, Qari Yousuf Ahmadi, said Monday its fighters had captured at least 25 government outposts and killed more than 100 soldiers and police.


Attack staged from tunnels


Regional military commander, General Wali Mohammad, told VOA the insurgents used tunnels dug from civilian houses to launch the attack.


Most of Helmand is under Taliban control. The government fully controls only Lashkar Gah, and a few surrounding district centers.


The United States has announced it would deploy a new group of about 300 troops to Helmand later this year to help Afghan forces defend the city and beat back the Taliban during the spring fighting season.

Report: 2016 Marks 11th Consecutive Year of Declining Global Freedom

Noting populist and nationalist forces making gains in democratic states last year, Freedom House has declared 2016 the 11th consecutive year of a decline in global freedom.


Of the 195 countries assessed in the Freedom House report, less than half were rated Free. Forty-nine countries were rated “not free”, and of those, Syria, Eritrea, North Korea, Uzbekistan, South Sudan, Turkmenistan, Somalia, Sudan, Equatorial Guinea, Central African Republic, and Saudi Arabia had the “worst” aggregate scores for political rights and civil liberties.


The United States was listed as one of the countries rated “free,” but also was said to have faced setbacks in “political rights, civil liberties, or both” in the “Freedom in the World 2017” report released Tuesday.


Brazil, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, and Tunisia were also among the countries listed as free, but flagged by the report as facing “counter-democratic” transitions. In particular, the report said countries in Central Europe, which saw “remarkable” transitions to democracy in the 1980s and 1990s “will be substantially reversed by elected populist leaders”.


Though rated “partly free”, Turkey saw the largest one-year decline in its score, having been victim of multiple terrorist attacks in 2016 as well as mass arrests and detentions following a military coup over the summer.


Turkey’s score, like those of many other democracies, was negatively affected by its involvement in the Syrian conflict during the past year. The United States and a number of European countries saw what the report called a “weakening of democratic standards” due to the large influx of Syrian refugees.


The report also states the Syrian conflict and other extremism in the Middle East has taken attention away from “worsening domestic repression” in China and Russia.


The only country listed in the report with a positive trend toward being more free was Colombia, whose government made a historic deal with the FARC rebels earlier this year, ending a decades-long conflict in the South American country.

India Floats Universal Basic Income to Eradicate Poverty


In India, the government has unveiled a radical proposal to eliminate poverty – providing a universal basic income for all its citizens, while stressing that this is only a concept.


The idea was floated in the country’s just-released annual economic survey that said guaranteeing a stipend to cover every individual’s basic needs would promote social justice.


Chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian, the lead author of the survey, told reporters that the proposal has many challenges. “So it’s an idea whose time is right for further deliberation and discussion and not necessarily immediate implementation,” he said.


The survey suggests that a basic monthly income could replace a string of welfare subsidies for the poor that India currently has in place.


India spends billions of dollars on a rural work program that aims to ensure minimum employment for the poor and on subsidies such as food and fuel. The programs, however, have often been criticized for poor implementation, corruption, waste and very often failing to reach the intended beneficiaries.


To eliminate intermediaries and officials who critics say often siphon off some of the benefits, both the federal and central governments have made efforts to replace the subsidies with direct cash transfers in recent years.


A universal basic income, however, would be much more ambitious and expensive than the current poverty welfare programs and many economists say India simply does not have the resources for such an initiative. Even if the middle class and rich are excluded, it would have to cover more than a billion people. India has a population of 1.3 billion.


FILE - Indian Lambadi tribal villagers fill drinking water from a leaking pipe on a roadside at Chandampet Mandal in Nalgonda east of Hyderabad on April 25, 2016, in the southern Indian state of Telangana.


FILE – Indian Lambadi tribal villagers fill drinking water from a leaking pipe on a roadside at Chandampet Mandal in Nalgonda east of Hyderabad on April 25, 2016, in the southern Indian state of Telangana.


They say calculations in the survey show that ending the major subsidies for the poor would save 2.07 percent of GDP, but a universal basic income would need an outlay that would be more than double, amounting to 4.9 percent of GDP.


The survey considers various options such as covering only women at the start. “Women face worse prospects in almost every aspect of their daily lives – employment opportunities, education, health or financial inclusion,” the survey says.


Some other countries are experimenting with the idea of a universal basic income – Finland has launched a trial program for unemployed residents. In Switzerland, voters rejected such a proposal last year.


The proponents of a basic income say every citizen has the right to a minimum income that ensures his or her basic needs; critics say it takes away the incentive to work.


The annual economic survey also suggested that the controversial currency ban implemented by the government last year has taken a toll on the economy. It estimated that growth would be one-quarter to one-half percentage points lower than the earlier forecast of 7 percent, but added that the adverse impact on gross domestic product “will be transitional.”


The government scrapped high value notes making up 86 percent of the country’s currency last November in a bid to crack down on illegal money. The biggest impact of the cash squeeze was on the country’s informal sector, which makes up more than two-thirds of the economy, employs millions and relies heavily on cash transactions.

White House: Yates" Refusal to Enforce Trump Order "Bewildering and Defiant"

The White House on Tuesday mounted a blunt defense of President Donald Trump’s decision to fire the nation’s top prosecutor, calling acting Attorney General Sally Yates’ refusal to enforce an executive order limiting travel from seven mostly Muslim countries “bewildering and defiant.”


“Ms. Yates failed to enforce a legal order…designed to protect the citizens of the United States,” press secretary Sean Spicer said in defending Trump’s move. Addressing reporters Tuesday, Spicer called Yates’ actions “a betrayal” and said she was “rightfully removed” from office.


He also called on Democratic lawmakers in the Senate to “quit their obstruction and confirm” Senator Jeff Sessions as the next attorney general, and to approve other Trump Cabinet nominees under Senate consideration.


Earlier Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly also defended Trump’s executive order, which suspends entry to all refugees for 120 days and bans Syrian refugees indefinitely. It also blocks people from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Yemen and Somalia from entering the U.S. for three months.


Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly speaks at a news conference at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection headquarters in Washington, Jan. 31, 2017, to discuss the operational implementation of the president


Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly speaks at a news conference at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection headquarters in Washington, Jan. 31, 2017, to discuss the operational implementation of the president’s executive orders.


“This is not a travel ban, this is a temporary pause that allows us to review the existing refugee and vetting visa system.” Kelly said. “We can not gamble with American lives,” he added.


Officials say 872 refugees will be admitted to the country because of hardship concerns, despite the order.


Yates’ firing Monday came just hours after she ordered the Justice Department not to defend his executive order.


The president then immediately appointed Dana Boente to serve as acting attorney general until the Senate confirms a full-time choice.


Boente, the U.S. attorney for the eastern district of Virginia, vowed to enforce the Trump directives.


The drama that unfolded Monday began with Yates, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, issuing written guidance to Department of Justice employees saying she was not convinced that a defense of Trump’s executive order was lawful.


“My responsibility is to ensure that the position of the Department of Justice is not only legally defensible, but is informed by our best view of what the law is after consideration of all the facts,” Yates said. “In addition, I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution’s solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right.”


House Speaker Paul Ryan also defended Trump’s order Tuesday, saying “the president has a responsibility to the security of this country.” He did say that “regrettably the rollout was confusing.”


While campaigning last year for the presidency, Trump proposed a ban on all Muslims entering U.S. territory. He later amended his proposal to call for “extreme vetting” of people from countries with links to terrorism.


‘Alarming’ and ‘chilling’


The president’s decision to fire Yates drew objections from Democrats in Congress, including House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, who called the move “alarming.”


“The American people need to consider whether President Trump simply plans to dismiss anyone with whom he disagrees, and I hope my Republican colleagues stand up and express concern over this as well,” Hoyer said.


Senator Chuck Schumer, who described the immigration ban as “un-American,” wrote on Twitter: “The AG should pledge fidelity to the law and the Constitution not the White House. The fact that this [administration] doesn’t understand that is chilling.”


Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who is on the committee voting on the Sessions nomination, said if Trump’s reaction to Yates is how he deals with dissent, “it’s a dangerous path for America.”


For his part, Republican Senator Ted Cruz, one of Trump’s 2016 primary campaign opponents, strongly defended the decision to fire Yates, describing her actions as a “fitting and sad” last act of Obama’s DOJ.


“President Trump was exactly right to fire an acting attorney general who refused to carry out her constitutional duty to enforce and defend the law,” Cruz said.


The opposition to Trump’s executive order is also coming from former officials, including a group of more than 130 who served either in the Obama administration or that of former President George W. Bush. They sent a letter Monday to the heads of the Justice Department, State Department and Department of Homeland Security expressing “deep concern” over the order that they say “will do long term damage to our national security.”

Trump to Announce Supreme Court Pick Later Tuesday

U.S. President Donald Trump is due to announce his Supreme Court nominee late Tuesday.


The nine-member court has had a vacant seat since the death last year of Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative stalwart on the court for 30 years.


Former President Barack Obama had nominated appellate court Judge Merrick Garland to fill the seat. But the Republican-controlled Senate refused to consider Garland’s nomination, saying it wanted the next president to make the nomination.


White House spokesman Sean Spicer predicted Tuesday President Trump’s nominee will please voters who cast presidential ballots based on the future composition of the high court. “I can ensure you that this individual will make those voters and every American very, very proud.” Spicer added that the president has taken the selection process very seriously. “He knows it will impact the courts of our country’s jurisprudence for generations to come,” Spicer said.


The court is split between four conservatives and four liberals, so Trump’s pick can restore a conservative majority.


Trump has been considering several conservative judges for the appointment.


Media reports say the front-runners include federal judges Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman.


The appointee will likely consider hotly-debated issues such as abortion, religious rights, transgender rights, the death penalty and gun control.


The 49-year-old Gorsuch currently serves on the10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in the Western city of Denver, Colorado. Gorsuch joined an opinion in 2013 saying that owners of private companies can object on religious grounds to an Affordable Care Act provision requiring employers to provide insurance coverage for birth control for women.


Hardiman has supported a broad interpretation of the constitutional right to bear arms. Hardiman, 51, has also backed the right of schools to restrict student speech.


Whoever is appointed, conservatives are hoping the Supreme Court will favor restrictions imposed on abortion by some Republican-governed states.


Since Scalia’s death, the high court has avoided some controversial issues, including a high profile case involving Gavin Grimm, a female-born transgender high school student who identifies as a male. The case is currently under consideration after he sued in 2015 to win the right to use the school’s boys’ bathroom in Virginia.

Pakistan Army Rejects Afghan Terror Charges


Pakistan’s military said Tuesday that it was not involved in acts of terrorism in neighboring Afghanistan and called on Afghan forces to boost security on their side of a largely porous 2,600-kilometer border between the two countries.


Kabul accuses Pakistani security institutions of maintaining covert ties to the Taliban and allowing the insurgent group to use sanctuaries in Pakistan to plot violence in Afghanistan.


At a news conference at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi, army spokesman Major General Asif Ghafoor rejected the allegations.


“Pakistan will never allow its soil to be used against any country,” he asserted, saying his country desired peace in Afghanistan and had been making all possible efforts to promote Afghan peace and stability.


Ghafoor insisted that years of counterterrorism operations in areas near the Afghan border had eliminated all sanctuaries and most of the terrorists there had been killed, while those remaining had fled and taken refuge in Afghanistan because of an absence of troops on the other side.


Pakistan has also built new outposts, military forts and border crossings to deter terrorist infiltration and expects Afghanistan to take similar steps to enable the two countries to effectively fight terrorism, the army spokesman said.


Afghans urged to step up


“What we have to do on our side of the border, we have done it and we will keep doing it,” Ghafoor said. “Afghanistan has to take certain actions, and we are in coordination [and contact] with the Afghan leadership that they require to take certain measures on their side of the border.”


Ghafoor said Pakistan had deployed about 200,000 troops in recent years for securing the border with Afghanistan and helping internationally backed peace efforts in the neighboring country.


He reiterated concerns that fugitive militants hiding in Afghanistan threatened Pakistani counterterrorism gains, forcing Islamabad to maintain the current troop presence on the western border, instead of reducing it.


“The strategic threat still resides across the [Afghan] border,” Ghafoor said, adding that as long as that condition continued, “we will have to keep a level of presence along the western border.”


For their part, Afghan leaders maintain that while Pakistani security operations have targeted anti-state militants, they have spared leaders and commanders of the Taliban and its close ally, the Haqqani terrorist network, and continue to stage deadly attacks in Afghanistan from safe havens in Pakistan.

Trump Presidency Thus Far? Russia, for One, Is Pleased


Russians have largely greeted Donald Trump’s ascendancy to the White House with high hopes for a new era of improved relations with the United States. And judging by this week’s reaction, the first telephone call between Presidents Trump and Putin has done nothing to diminish those expectations.


In his influential weekly news program Vesti Nedeli, anchor Dmitry Kiselev praised the 45-minute conversation as the “most awaited phone call on Earth.”


“Donald Trump is fulfilling his election promises and getting rid of Obama’s pathetic legacy,” Kiselev said during the broadcast.


Kremlin officials have been more circumspect, if only slightly.


On Monday, presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the conversation as “constructive” with both men showing a desire to resolve “complex issues through dialogue.”


Peskov said such cooperation was not possible under the Obama administration, with whom the Kremlin sparred bitterly over Moscow’s annexation of Crimea, military support for Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, and allegations of interference in the U.S. presidential election, among other issues.


Indeed, following the phone call, statements from both the Kremlin and White House stressed a desire to find common ground.


Sanctions relief?


The Kremlin said the leaders expressed an interest in closer cooperation in fighting Islamic State terrorists, as well as dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Iran nuclear deal, and North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. There was no indication that the presidents discussed the charges that Russia tried to interfere with the U.S. election.



The U.S. Embassy building is reflected in a window of a Russian military outerwear shop “Armia Rossii” (Russian Army) displaying a poster of U.S. President Donald Trump, in downtown Moscow, Russia, Jan. 20, 2017. The poster offered a discount for embassy employees and U.S. citizens on Trump’s Inauguration Day.


Nor do the two appear to have discussed Western sanctions over Russia’s actions in Ukraine, although the tone of the call fed into speculation that they could soon be eased.


Key European allies – in line with the former Obama administration – have proposed partially lifting the sanctions only if Moscow fulfills its obligations under the Minsk Peace Accords aimed at ending the fighting in east Ukraine between Kyiv government forces and pro-Russian separatists.


President Trump has suggested he could lift sanctions in exchange for a reduction in Russia’s nuclear arsenal or a commitment to fight the Islamic State.


In his press call Monday, Kremlin spokesman Peskov insisted sanctions were not raised during the Trump-Putin call.


A shift in tone


But many observers pointed hopefully to a Kremlin statement that the two leaders expressed a desire improve “economic cooperation.”


“To fully develop economic ties, it’s necessary to create the right climate and legal conditions,” said Russian lawmaker Dmitri Novikov in comments reported by the Interfax news agency. “That requires canceling sanctions.”


Kremlin allies also contrasted the apparently warm rapport between Trump and Putin to the Russian president’s frosty relationships with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francoise Hollande.


Indeed, some argued that the budding Trump-Putin friendship had the potential to shake traditional U.S. allies to the core.


“Kyiv, Vilnius, Riga, Tallinn, Warsaw, Oslo, Stockholm, NATO – they’re all horrified by the results of the Putin-Trump call,” crowed Alexey Pushkov, a Russian lawmaker and former head of the Duma’s Foreign Affairs committee in a post to Twitter.


Books by and about Donald Trump, U.S. president-elect at the time, are on display in the Moscow House of Books store in Moscow, Russia, Nov. 14, 2016. Trump


Books by and about Donald Trump, U.S. president-elect at the time, are on display in the Moscow House of Books store in Moscow, Russia, Nov. 14, 2016. Trump’s books and literature about him have been at high demand at Moscow book stores following his victory in the U.S. presidential elections, according to the bookstore.


Hacking charges


Yet hovering over any budding detente are the accusations the Kremlin meddled in the U.S. election with the aim of helping Trump win the White House.


So, too, are unsubstantiated claims the Kremlin possesses compromising sexual material on Trump from a visit to Moscow in 2013.


A U.S. investigation also is continuing into whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign team and Russian officials during the election campaign.


Moscow has repeatedly denied the hacking charges, and angrily dismissed related allegations as attempts to sabotage a new era in U.S.-Russian relations.


Still, the hacking scandal gained new intrigue with recent Russian news reports that two intelligence officers from the FSB’s cybersecurity unit were among six Russian nationals arrested and charged with treason.


According to sources quoted by the Interfax news agency, those arrested are suspected of providing information to the CIA – raising questions of its possible connections to the U.S. investigation into Russian hacking.


Kremlin officials have yet to comment.


Who is playing whom?


Warranted or not, the hacking scandal has made the Trump team sensitive to charges it is beholden to Moscow.


Some Russia analysts point to the White House’s decision to release photos of Trump on the phone with Putin surrounded by Vice President Mike Pence and other advisors as a sign of the administration’s concerns over the optics of Russian rapprochement.


But Russian political analyst Feodor Krashenninkov argues the “Trump as Putin’s puppet” theory is overblown.


In an interview with VOA, Krashenninkov noted that Trump’s actions are hemmed in by Republican lawmakers who favor a hardline approach to Russia.


“Putin – by contrast – can give away anything,” says Krashenninkov, who noted – in a twist – that it is Putin who would be more likely to embrace the title of Trump’s bestseller, The Art of the Deal.


FILE - Russian political experts react as they watch a live telecast of the U.S. presidential election in the Union Jack pub in Moscow, Russia, Nov. 9, 2016. While welcoming Donald Trump


FILE – Russian political experts react as they watch a live telecast of the U.S. presidential election in the Union Jack pub in Moscow, Russia, Nov. 9, 2016. While welcoming Donald Trump’s win in the U.S. election, some discount the theory of Trump as Putin’s puppet.


Krashenninkov argued that Trump, in his introductory conversation with the Russian leader, borrowed from another book of American tycoon lore: Dale Carnegie’s 1936 classic How to Win Friends and Influence People.


Wherever U.S.-Russian relations head next, some in Moscow were reveling in the domestic controversy arising during Trump’s first week in office – including mass protests against the administration’s decision to temporarily ban admission to the United States of all refugees and most citizens of seven Middle Eastern countries.


Maxim Shevchenko, a pro-Kremlin journalist, urged his government to enjoy – if not stoke – the chaos.


“Trump is a symbol of the deep, insurmountable and not easily defined confrontation of the societal, political, and economic split in America… therefore, greetings Trump!’ Shevchenko wrote in a post to his Facebook account.


“The more chaos, anger, and confrontation they have the better.”

Categories

Article How-to All Posts WordPress Android Web design Blogger Plugins CSS Google JQuery Plugins Programming Reviews Web Hosting Blogger Blogging Blogging Tips Tricks Web Development Facebook Git Internet Make Money Online Social Plugins Tips Tips and Tricks Tools Tutorials Windows WordPress Plugins Blogging Tips and Tricks Freebies GSM Google Analytics HTML How To's JavaScript Plugin Development S.E.O SEO SMS SmartPhone Social Media Tips amp; Tricks Top-Most Updates Webmaster Tools Whatsapp Applications Apps Blogger Basics Documentary Downloads Entertainment Gadgets Games Gmail Google AdSense Guest Post IPhone Make Money Blogging SVN Security Softwares Web Hosting Tips and Tricks Wordpress Tips Wordpress Tips and Tricks hostgator iOS Advertising Networks Advertising Technology Affiliates Antivirus Audience amp; Traffic Biography Blog post Blog post Blogger Blogger Errors Blogger Tips Blogger Tools Blogger Widget Blogosphere Bogger Widgets CSS selectors CSS symbols CSS3 Computer amp; Internet Content Writing Coupon Codes Data amp; Analytics Deleted blog Design DoubleClick for Publishers Email and newsletter marketting Email marketing Excel Tips Excel Tips and Tricks Facebook Tricks Feed Feedburner Feedburner subscribers Font Fun GitHub Giveaways Gmail primary inbox Gmail tabs Google sign-in Guides HTML amp; CSS HTML5 Infographics Inspirational Instagram Internet Marketing Internet Tips amp; Tricks Job Listings Knowledge Life Hacks Lists Make-Money Monetization amp; Conversion Monetize Navigation Online Marketing Other PHP Tutorials Passport Publishing amp; Content Quotes RSS Sidebar Smartphones Social Networking Status Tech Tech Blog Technology Telegram Themes UI / UX User Psychology amp; Research VB.Net Web Tools Web browser Widget Windows Tips Windows-10 ad viewability admin notice blogging tools bluehost cherry-pick clone cors custom scrollbar customizer dismissible notices duplicate post feed title git branch git clone gpg gpg2 hybridauth iPad icon font notice responsive wordpress theme same origin policy scrollbar signed git commit smartsvn theme customizer vcs wordpress theme wordpress themes

Blog Archive